Visualizzazione dei post in ordine di pertinenza per la query arrival. Ordina per data Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione dei post in ordine di pertinenza per la query arrival. Ordina per data Mostra tutti i post

29/03/18

21st-CENTURY DYSTOPIA AND UTOPIA, AND A RE-CENTRING OF HUMANISM (Part 1)

[Flora on a cold planet lit by a green sun (Killiney 2018). Foto Rb]


Introduction[1]

The first part of this paper, published in this issue, proposes to look at some international science-fiction films that explore human society and behaviour in either a negative or positive light, and more specifically in terms of dystopia and utopia. The second part, to be published in the next issue of Carte allineate, will focus mainly on some essays on post-humanism and inequality. On the whole, this paper expresses a need to re-centre humanist ethical and aesthetic values.


1. Some samples of 21st century dystopian and utopian science fiction

Commercialized dystopian science fiction worldwide, accompanied by an ideology of cynicism and an aesthetics of spectacular exaggeration, seems to be one of the current prevalent strategies of literary and cinematic globalized representation of the imminent future.

A Western example is the series of films The Hunger Games, directed by Francis Lawrence and Gary Ross (2012-2015), based on Suzanne Collins’ novels. This group of films depicts a social dystopian society where the politics of the ruling elite are all-winning, but the oppressed finally stage a revolt. Its aesthetics appears rather excessive in portraying the killing techniques of the archery-based games which give the title to the series, and in depicting the violent means adopted by strong-willed adolescent heroes to lead a revolution. The main social background is progressive and supports collective action, but the motif of brutal combat is commercial. One might argue that, by contrast to its anti-establishment political ideology, the action side of the film aims at entertaining and increasing sales.

An Eastern example might be Korean director Bong Joon Ho’s film Snowpiercer (2013), based on Transperceneige, a graphic novel by Jacques Lob, Benjamin Legrand and Jean-Marc Rochette.[2] As the present author stated in a previously published essay,[3] this film combines synergies of Eastern and Western cinematography and it constitutes a globalized popular product for consumption, intended for those who like fast action and violence. The message conveyed is rather black since the plot focuses on the fight of human beings against their fellow human beings until most die. Yet, the survival of two innocent young characters, a girl and a boy, would seem to indicate the possibility of a post-apocalyptic positive future of rebirth of humankind.

More moderate in spectacular aesthetics and more serious in thoughtful content, though still a partly cliched action work deploying use of martial arts, is Japanese film Cutie Honey: Tears (2017), directed by Asai Takeshi, a story of integration as well as conflict between humans and cyborgs in a dystopian society. A final duel ends with the defeat of evil dictatorial political power, and it is therefore suggested that dystopia based on greed, inequality and insane totalitarianism might give way to the utopia of wiser humans and cyborgs able to cooperate and cope with excessively uneven class distinction, environmental pollution, and the peril represented by emotionless cynicism.

Several more recent examples of globalized spectacular science fiction might be quoted here, including perhaps, most famously, the recent episodes of the Star Wars saga, the so-called Sequel Trilogy (2015-2017), directed by J.J. Abrams and Ryan Johnson, in which freedom fighters operate in action stories that are typical in commercial entertainment, thus standing a few steps apart from philosophical reflection, accurate representation of the negative sides of society, and realistic portrayal of a credible war situation. Surely the archetypal fight of Shadow (“the dark side”) against Wisdom adds interesting Jungian connotations to this story,[4] yet its potential for social analysis and introspection is obscured by exaggerated evil doing and noisy battles similar both to cliched air duels from Second World War movies and fast contemporary video games.

Dystopia and utopia could be a way to identify the plague of society and ways out of them. This was the case with world-wide well known classic predecessors, such as Lucian, Jonathan Swift, and H.G. Wells in Western literature. In the East, with due caution for difference in philosophical approaches between Europe and China, one could perhaps mention Confucius, and even Mao Zedong as Douwe Fokkema does,[5] and among the numerous modern utopian and dystopian classics from Japan, one of the most prominently translated into Western languages is Ryūnosuke Akutagawa’s Kappa.[6] However, contemporary spectacular commercialization defeats the committed purpose of this kind of works because, as suggested by the cinematic examples listed above, it results, partly if not entirely, in banalization of serious questions, accompanied by mere entertainment which is at contrast with dramatic sociological scenarios.

Perhaps, what we need in the place of 21st-century spectacular dystopia is a projection towards constructive changes in mentality, and a realistic, yet imaginative belief that the future can be modified to the benefit of sentient beings. On the level of aesthetics, a reflective and non-spectacular poetics, addressed to the analysing mind and the compassionate emotions of film-goers, might be preferable to loud and violent shows and special effects. Let us see two examples: Jennifer Phang’s film Advantageous (2015), and a film directed by Denis Villeneuve, entitled Arrival (2016) and based on Ted Chiang’s “Story of your life”.[7]

A few words, first, on Advantageous. The style of this socially committed science fiction film is elegant. It averts sensational statements and imagery, thus enhancing its content in a thoughtful, and therefore intellectually effective way. The acting has good theatrical quality. The main topic is the development of automation and artificial intelligence with a number of negative social consequences such as high rates of unemployment, increase of inequality, the collapse of the middle class, and in particular the social disadvantage of women. The fifty-year-old woman-model and manager protagonist, confronted with being fired due to age, and in order to keep an adequate level of employment, undertakes an experiment conducted by her firm, during which her brain is transferred into a younger body. The operation is successful, but a number of problems appear in her second life, in particular her maternal love vanishes, and as a result her emotions change and her family life is damaged. In addition to the main themes of eugenics and the evolution of work in an imminent post-human future, this thoughtful film mentions terrorist attacks that take place in the background among the indifference of most spectators; future technological objects imagined functionally and realistically; high-rising urbanization; in brief a future that we can understand and on which we have to reflect because it derives from problems we are beginning to confront now.

Moving on to Arrival, we witness the landing of an extra-terrestrial spaceship piloted by non-anthropomorphic beings called “Eptapodes”. A team of Earthlings attempt to decipher their difficult language comprised of “semagrams”, or circular symbols carrying meaning. This language is predictive, and its scientific foundation can be found in Fermat’s principle: “light travels between two points along the path that requires the least time, as compared to other nearby paths”.[8] The Eptapode language can see into the future, but a component of free-will is entrusted to the choice to follow or not follow predestined paths. The Eptapodes have come to Earth to help human beings because they know the planet Earth is in danger, and they predict an emergency in their own planet which will be helped by Earthlings in the long-term of three millennia. This is why, before they suddenly and somewhat inexplicably take off, the Eptapodes leave an unspecified gift, but one can guess the gift is their language itself. Human interpretation of this language prevents a war among the superpowers of our planet and opens a future of collaboration and unification between all countries on Earth. This story is complex, well-articulated, rather intellectual but not especially elitist, it is in fact democratically intended for a wide audience at multiple levels of education. The film is visually moderate in special effects, yet imaginative and surreal, with the aliens’ spaceship partly comparable to paintings by Magritte, and a curved variation on Stanley Kubrick’s monolith from 2001: A Space Odissey. The utopian last section of Arrival prefigures a future in which human beings have to collaborate with each other for survival. The actors are not superhuman but ordinary beings. A pensive film, it runs opposite to the main trend of flashy and trivial plots.

Other than dystopia as found in Advantageous, we have utopia in Arrival, yet in both cases science fiction is adopted for its potential to engage audiences to react rationally to sociological ideas on the “risk society” in which we already live,[9] and analyse the human condition also from psychological and existential perspectives.

From a global angle, in addition to multicultural aspects in the life of United States authors Phang and Chiang (Phang’s Vietnamese and Malaysian-Chinese heritage, and Chiang’s Chinese parents), one could mention the attention paid by French Canadian director Villeneuve to initial divergence and final cooperation between China and the West. Furthermore, the Eptapode language might originate from Oriental characters rather than a Western alphabet. There is a serious scientific and linguistic substratum, and the representation of the other under the guise of an extra-terrestrial civilization is politically correct since it depicts biological difference of non-humans from humans while it enhances the importance of intercultural communication and mutual understanding. These non-cliched cosmopolitan comparisons and integrations of intellectual elements are indeed deeper than the stereotyped references of some science fiction films from Hollywood to Eastern culture simply by means of devices such as Oriental martial arts.


[Roberto Bertoni]



[1] This is a virtual Presentation Paper for ACAH 2018, The Asian Conference on the Arts and Humanities, Kobe, Japan - March 30 to April 1, 2018.
[2] Transperceneige (graphic novel 1984-2000), Tournai, Casterman, 2013.
[3] Roberto Bertoni, “East/West Interaction in Some Comics Written in French”, in Roberto Bertoni, ed., Aspects of science fiction since the 1980s: China, Italy, Japan, Korea, Trinity College Dublin and Trauben Turin, 2015, pp. 23-42.
[4] As noted, among others, by Christopher Booker in The Seven Basic Plots, London and New York, Continuum, 2014.
[5] Dowe Fokkema, Perfect Worlds: Utopian Fiction in China and the West, Amsterdam University Press, 2011. See in particular, in Chapter 7, the section entitled “The Confucian Concept of Perfect Virtue”, pp. 166-171, and Chapter 15, “Mao Zedong’s Utopian Thought and the Post-Mao Imaginative Response”, pp. 321-344.
[6] Among essays on Japanese utopia and dystopia, see Susan J. Napier, The Fantastic in Modern Japanese Literature: The Subversion of Modernity, London and New York, Routledge, 1996. See in particular Chapters 5, “Logic of Inversion: Twentieth-Century Japanese Utopias”, and Chapter 6, “The Dystopian Imagination: From the Asylum through the Labyrinth to the End of the World”, pp. 141-220.
[7] Ted Chang, Stories of Your Life and Others, London, Picador, 2015. Previous versions of the ideas expressed here on Advantageous and Arrival had been published in Italian under the form of reviews in online journal Carte allineate (ISSN 2009-7123), available from:
and: http://cartescoperterecensionietesti.blogspot.ie/2016/12/denis-villeneuve-arrival.html.
[8] http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph5B/fermat09.pdf.
[9] See Ulrich Beck, Risk Society, London, Sage, 2002.

30/11/16

CARTE ALLINEATE. Seconda serie, numero 51, Novembre 2016 / Second series, issue 51, November 2016

Per gli articoli del mese, vai a Novembre 2016 in ARCHIVIO BLOG, o consulta l'INDICE ALFABETICO qui sotto. Per gli arretrati vai a ARCHIVIO BLOG; e a Di cosa si parla su Carte allineate: Indici, nella colonna di destra in questa pagina. Cerca nomi e titoli specifici con il SEARCH BLOG; e gli argomenti tramite le ETICHETTE, sempre nella colonna di destra. Nella colonna di sinistra si trovano anche i LINKS con altri siti / Find the entries in the current month at Novembre 2016 in ARCHIVIO BLOG or in the INDEX below. Find past issues in ARCHIVIO BLOG, and in Di cosa si parla su Carte allineate: Indici, a section which is situated on the right end side column on this page. Look for specific names and titles by using the SEARCH BLOG. Consult topics by using the ETICHETTE (or LABELS), again on the right hand column. LINKS to other sites are also provided on the left end column in this page.


INDICE ALFABETICO / INDEX


Le voci elencate qui sotto senza il nome dell’autore sono state scritte, e le foto sono state scattate, da Roberto Bertoni.

07/08/19

Ted Chiang, STORY OF YOUR LIFE AND OTHERS

Londra, MacMillan (Picador), 2002. (Edizione Kindle)


Avevamo già citato un racconto di questa raccolta, “Story of your life”, quello che dà il titolo al volume e ha ispirato l’ottimo film di fantascienza Arrival

Anche gli altri racconti del volume non deludono. Presentano riferimenti scientifici o culturali d’altro tipo ed elaborazioni fantastiche.  I nostri preferiti qui sotto.

In “Tower of Babylon” si immagina una produzione della torre in altezza, come nella tradizione, che coincide con la forma della Terra e ne costituisce il segreto, forse rappresentandone anche l’inutilità.

“Understand” si basa sull’ipotesi di un ormone che moltiplica le capacità intellettive, ma quando a svilupparsi in questa direzione sono due esseri umani anziché uno, uno dei due è  destinato a essere sconfitto e soccombere.

“Division by zero” intercala massime di matematici, soprattutto sull’improbabilità dell’apparente esattezza di questa disciplina a restituire il reale appropriatamente, con le vicende personali della docente imbattutasi in un teorema insolubile e prossima al divorzio.

Oltre a lasciare soluzioni aperte e a esprimere paradossi, Chiang si apre verso il fantastico oltre  che la fantascienza e scrive in un inglese fluido e letterario senza essere affetttato.


[Roberto Bertoni]



17/01/10

Augustus Young, ULYSSES O’NEILL’S ROMAN HOLIDAY

1.

The sea at the end of the road welcomes me back.
with a wave of spray from beyond the jetty wall.
I have got to where I was going anyway -
around in circles. My journey home seems to lack
a certain point of departure and arrival.
Wandering is the only place where I can stay.
‘That’s poetry for you.’ The wave recoils. ‘A port
of call to re-provision yourself, and to sport.’

Reality is my home, a continuum that wears
me out, drip by drop, till I drown in a puddle
of my own making, and hardly notice it. Cares
come and go, and in between the daily muddle.
‘You need a break’, says the wave. ‘Give yourself poem.’
So I transport myself by Homer Tours to Rome.


2.

It started badly. Rome wasn’t ruined in a day [1].
Built in the reflected glory of laying waste,
with monumental works and pomps deifying man,
marble is riven rock. The limestone it overlays
strains off the marsh until it cracks. I saw sliced pan,
the cut-price manna, go with the Tiber’s slow flow.
And it was snowing on the Via Veneto -

the flakes less real than special effects, or the moult
of Da Vinci’s beard. I didn’t recognise any-
one from Cinecittà, or sin city of old,
save a living-statue of Marcello Mastroianni,
and a bag woman as Sophia Loren in Hades,
scarlet lipstick smeared behind her luminous shades.

The Gucci world is counterfeit. I try Trastevere.
Only the young about, tourists in the travails
that I once thought were life. Now all the same to me:
blind dates in tawdry bars, loud music and cocktails.
Where are all the backpackers gone? And real Romans?
Have the ragazzi been re-housed in the catacombs?

A blank screen in St Peter’s Square. Papa, they claim,
gone home to play Holy Father Weihnachten. Thus it’s
Caravaggio and Francis Bacon reign profane
in Museo Borghese. The cold hand of Judith
draws blood from the Babylonian’s neck. The ketchup ooze
on Berlusconi’s mugged mug is the latest news.

I see the coy frescos of Sodoma Bazzi
through the eyes of Vasari. ‘His beastliness tamed
in the Barberini is a shame. Alas he
had to pay his taxes’. Old Masters can’t be blamed -
anymore than those who stuff their ears and faces
with mobiles and tortas. It’s just the way it is.

But Benedict is in town. He blesses a crib.
Speaks of God at Natale making Himself a child [2].
Midnight Mass was early. A woman in red skipped
over Swiss Guards to knock him down, and he smiled.
Now pressing the flesh will be a thing of the past.
He’ll only be touched by the Almighty. Peace at last.

I haven’t the heart to bus out to the outskirts
to gawp at the life Pasolini loved to death.
‘Our Neo-fascism must abort all hope at birth,
homogenising what it assimilates.’ Yet
Mussolini knew his people. ‘Faith moves mountains
as it gives the illusion mountains move.’ Fountains

freeze in the air. The Eternal City’s dying
before my eyes. All hell-fire traffic and neon signs
for goods you get anywhere. No longer the shrine
my mother came to for a pre-nuptial blessing.
Basta! Jump the sightseeing bus for a last gape
at the Second Vittorio Emanuele’s marble cake.

All roads lead to Rome, and there’s only one exit -
see it and die. But Homer Tours gives me the nod.
‘Pilgrims to Santiago de Compostela leg it.
We’ll conjure you up a flight by a winged god
to where you came from, on condition you submit
to staying put. You’ll have to learn to live with it.’


3.

Experience is the name we give to our mistakes,
or our mistaking others. It goes with the flow
like a meandering river, till the dam breaks
with memories flooding back, as you grow
to regret what you are not, and what might have been.
In the dark night of the soul it’s your waking dream.

Glad to be back. Catching up with what I didn’t know
happened in my absence. Home truths. What Zeus ruled
for his playthings, ‘Mankind is taught wisdom through woe’
may suit the powers that be. But I’m no longer fooled.
The left behind made do, and were well without me.
I end up where I began, breathing easily,

though the breath of life is nearing its last gasp
as the subterranean beckons. There’s no more
past imperfect, future tense. Here I am. I bask,
salaaming the sea, and hearing its inner roar
at the futility of voyaging anywhere,
save in the poetry of what’s neither here nor there.

Mooring ropes rattle their corsetry in the wind.
and sailors, knowing they’re going nowhere, compose
shanties about their lives, not what others imagined.
I’ll sing life out too. And the revenants of those
I lived with, and left somewhere between right and wrong,
return as the chorus to my valedictory song [3].

Sing to the belated triumph of the human
over the ignoble in man. I hear myself
answering to what is around me. I tune in-
to the down to earth. What has been left on the shelf -
the pots and pans of living life against the grain,
and going down to the pub. ‘What will you have?’ ‘The same.’


FOOTNOTES

[1] ‘How can you, Palladio, give this building the noblest form possible?
Because of contradictory demands, you are bound to bungle things,
here and there, and it may well happen that there will be some
incongruities. But the building as a whole will be in the noble style
of the Roman ruins, and you will enjoy doing the work.’ Goethe’s ITALIAN JOURNEY (1816).

[2] ‘At Christmas, the Almighty becomes a child and asks for our help and protection. It is His way of challenging our way of being human […] God’s sign to us is that He makes himself all small. He lets us touch him. And He asks for our love.’ (Pope Benedict’s ‘Christmas Message’, 2010).

[3] ‘In Ovid, love speaks as though it were a human being […] The Latin poets did not write in this manner without good reason, nor should those who compose in rhyme, if they cannot justify what they say; for it would be a disgrace if someone composing in rhyme introduced a figure of speech or rhetorical ornament, and then on being asked could not divest his words of such covering so as to reveal a true meaning. My most intimate friends and I know quite a number who compose poems in this stupid manner.’ Dante Alighieri, LA VITA NUOVA, xxv.

19/02/12

Brian Selznick e Martin Scorsese, THE INVENTION OF HUGO CABRET


[Merry-go-round evoking the past in Paris. Foto Rb]


Brian Selznick, THE INVENTION OF HUGO CABRET, Londra, Scholastic, 2007. Versione cinematografica: regia di Martin Scrosese, con Asa Butterfield, Sacha Baron Cohen, Ben Kingsley, Chrstopher Lee, Chloë Grace Moretz, Emily Mortimer, Ray Winstone


Nato nel 1966, Brian Selznik è illustratore e autore di libri per l’infanzia [1]. L’INVENZIONE DI HUGO CABRET si compone di scrittura e di immagini in bianco e nero, concepite come nei libri di fiabe per accompagnare il testo, ma disposte in varie serie in modo tale da costituire raggruppamenti successivi, come stills di una pellicola cinematografica, o fotosequenze, che talora sottolineano e talora sostituiscono il testo scritto contribuendo a farlo avanzare.

Si tratta, non solo nella concezione narrativa (lungo per numero di pagine, ma conciso nelle sezioni scritte in linguaggio alfabetico), ma anche nelle tematiche e nell’intreccio, di un libro per ragazzi di impostazione classica, nel senso che sa parlare a questo gruppo d’età persuadendo al contempo un pubblico adulto, e di taglio sperimentale privo di pesantezza, fondato su riferimenti metatestuali soprattutto a Dickens e a Méliès, il quale ultimo è in effetti, come risulta dalla seconda parte della storia narrata, il coprotagonista assieme al ragazzo da cui prende il titolo il volume.

In breve, Hugo Cabret, orfano di madre, ha perso il padre orologiaio e cerca di riparare un automa capace di scrivere che il genitore aveva trovato. A seguito di vari indizi, si viene infine a sapere che l’inventore dell’automa era il cineasta George Méliès. Questi ora vive oscuramente; e una volta scoperto narra la propria storia con riferimenti anche a sue opere, tra le quali, prevalente, il film LE VOYAGE DANS LA LUNE (1902), che Selznick non a torto definisce "la prima pellicola di fantascienza".

Accanto alla storia principale ci sono altre avventure, concatenate con ritmo incalzante nella versione cinematografica di Scorsese.

Il regista porta il colore ai disegni di Selznick e ricostruisce un quadro d’ambiente da mondo solido di prima modernità: le strutture metallica della Gare de Lyon, corridoi e sotterranei, orologi coi meccanismi evidenziati.

Nella parte su Méliès autore di cinema, col vantaggio della cinepresa sulla scrittura, si compongono richiami alle origini del cinema, spezzoni di pellicole, ricostruzioni degli studi, dei costumi, dei manierismi dell’epoca risuscitata con la nostalgia tardomoderna per un passato romanticizzato e ricorrrente in film recenti come l'opera di animazione UN MOSTRE À PARIS di Bibo Bergeron [2] e il muto L’ARTISTE di Michel Hazanavicius (entrambi del 2011).

A parere di Andrew Pulver, la storia di Hugo Cabret “gives Scorsese a perfect excuse to indulge in a brilliantly imagined potted history of pioneering cinema, the pre-narrative, urtexts of the medium, such as the ARRIVAL OF A TRAIN AT A STATION by the celebrated Lumière brothers” [3].

Peter Bradshaw enuclea uno dei simbolismi emotivi, individuando “a key point when Hugo must use a heart-shaped key to operate his automaton. The heart - that mediator between the head and the hands - is an image which points to the movies as a ghost in the machine: the technology, mass-production and grinding commerce which exploded in the 20th century would also facilitate the growth and vitality of the cinema itself” [4].

Tra i tanti riferimenti, a noi ha fatto pensare anche, per i colori e la recitazione dei protagonisti infantili, a THE GOLDEN COMPASS (romanzo di Philip Pullman e film diretto da Chris Weitz), dato che partecipa sia del realismo archivistico di cui parlano i critici citati, sia del fantasy in una sua sobria espressione [5].


NOTE

[1] Una sua nota autobiografica è a PERSONAL SITE.

[2] Cfr. “Carte allineate”, Nuova serie, n. 2, 2012.

[3] Cfr. “The Guardian”, 23-11-2011.

[4] Cfr. “The Guardian”, 1-12-2011.

[5] Cfr. “Carte allineate”, Prima serie, n. 12, 2007.


[Roberto Bertoni]

21/11/16

Denis Villeneuve, ARRIVAL



[Was it an alien structure? (Dublin  2015). Foto Rb]


USA 2016. Tratto dal racconto “Story of your Life” di Ted Chang. Sceneggiatura du Eric Heisserer. Musica di Jóhann Jóhannsson. Con Amy Adams, Tzi Ma, Jeremy Renner, Michael Stuhlbarg, Forest Whitaker


È opportuno partire dal racconto di Chang [1], in cui l’arrivo di navi spaziali extraterrestri conduce al tentativo di comunicazione da parte di esperti terrestri: una studiosa di linguistica e uno studioso di fisica. La linguista, Louise, riesce a instaurare un rapporto con gli alieni, denominati eptapodi, decifrando la loro lingua scritta, diversa da quella parlata e fondata su “semagrammi”, o simboli visivi, complessi. Una volta capito il sistema simultaneo del linguaggio degli eptapodi sulla base anche del principio di Fermat, uno dei cui aspetti è la corsa della luce da un punto a un altro per la strada più rapida, si delinea l’aspetto temporale di questa lingua, teso verso il futuro, e tale da riflettere una concezione teleologica del mondo. Chi si impadronisce del linguaggio degli eptapodi è in grado di vedere il futuro: il libero arbitrio consiste nello scegliere coscientemente di seguire il cammino prefissato. Il racconto alterna il presente di un diario tenuto da Louise, in cui descrive alla figlia non ancora nata quanto accadrà nella sua vita, e il passato in cui racconta il contatto con gli esseri dello spazio, per dare un’impressione comprensibile del fatto che imparando il linguaggio degli eptapodi, la sua mentalità si è modificata, padroneggiando il tempo in sincronia dal passato al presente al futuro. Gli extraterrestri se ne vanno d’improvviso dopo avere spiegato che hanno lasciato agli esseri umani un dono che, non chiarito dal narratore, si può immaginare sia appunto il loro linguaggio e la prescienza. È un racconto intelligente, ben scritto, ben argomentato filosoficamente.

La resa cinematografica è anch’essa di buona qualità. Soprattutto ci hanno colpito le trasfigurazioni visive delle astronavi, che sono un chiaro omaggio ai parallelepipedi di 2001: Odissea nello spazio, con un tocco magrittiano nella forma ovale e sospesa da terreno

Forse con efficacia maggiore che nel racconto, mantenendo la forma a piovra e a sette tentacoli degli eptapodi, se ne lascia la materialità completa in sottordine, sorvolando sul numero di occhi e altri particolari. Li vediamo sempre dentro una specie di nebbia.

Il film sviluppa il racconto in direzione politica. Nella pellicola, gli alieni arrivano su vari paesi del Pianeta Terra. C’è un contrasto di intenzioni tra gli scienziati e i militari. All’inizio sembra che gli statunitensi facciano la parte dei “buoni”, evitando azioni ostili, e i cinesi la parte dei “cattivi” cercando di sopprimerli. Tuttavia l’eroina, seguendo un’intuizione trasmessa dagli eptapodi man mano che si impadronisce del loro linguaggio e della loro Weltanschauung, riesce a comunicare in una sacca spaziotemporale insolita col generale cinese, dal che consegue una collaborazione dei paesi della Terra e una loro unificazione, come avevano previsto e voluto gli alieni, questo nel film il loro dono all’umanità, che in cambio, comunicano a Louise prima di partire, li aiuterà tra tremila anni.

Film piuttosto notevole, a parte qualche ingenuità attualizzante qua e là.


NOTA

[1] In Stories of Your Life and Others, Londra, Picador, 2015.



[Roberto Bertoni]

13/02/18

Daniel Fitzsimmons, NATIVE

UK 2016. Sceneggiatura di Neil Atkinson e Daniel Fitzsimmons. Con Rubert Graves ed Ellie Kendrick

Questo film ha vari pregi: si rivolge alla mente dello spettatore, cui pone quesiti di umanità; è lento e riflessivo; la recitazione e lo spazio interno sono di tipo teatrale; la pellicola manca di effetti speciali spettacolari chiassosi e si avvale di rappresentazioni visive di buona qualità fotografica e con elementi elettronici; oltre a un brano, spesso ripetuto, della Quinta Sinfonia di Beethoven, ha una colonna sonora funzionale e gradevole, anch’essa di stampo elettronico, dei Baltic Fleet. In breve, rientra nell’ambito dei film di fantascienza (come, per esempio, Arrival e Advantageous) che vanno controcorrente rispetto alle tendenze commerciali e superficiali prevalenti.

La storia prende l’avvio su un pianeta lontano, abitato da esseri umanoidi che vivono in simbiosi come in un alveare, ciascuno collegato telepaticamente alla comunità per mezzo di un rapporto stretto con un essere di sesso opposto definito fratello o sorella. Quando perviene un segnale dalla Terra (pianeta svelato solo nell’ultima parte del film), che comprende, tra l’altro, note della Quinta Sinfonia di Beethoven, viene deciso di inviare un’astronave con a bordo soltanto due telepati particolarmente compatibili per diffondere un virus che distruggerà la popolazione terrestre e aprirà la strada a quella del pianeta inviante. Durante la traversata interstellare, uno degli astronauti, Cane, traumatizzato dalla perdita di contatto telepatico con la cosiddetta sorella, morta nel parto, rimasto dunque solo e un individuo isolato, frattanto affascinato dalla musica del messaggio terrestre, sviluppa una crisi d’identità che lo conduce a rinunciare al dispositivo telepatico. Viene neutralizzato, per ordine della direzione della missione, dall’altra astronauta, Eva che, raggiunta la destinazione, predispone una terrestre a ricevere e trasmettere il virus, ma la uccide perché la terrestre si ribella (stranamente la donna del nostro pianeta parla italiano nella versione originale inglese). Il trauma di Eva è questa morte, dopo la quale non riesce a portare a termine la missione, recupera Cane, anche lei si autodetelepatizza: i due astronauti vanno a vivere sulla superficie del pianeta. Le ultime parole del film sono: “Ho paura”, il timore, cioè dell’ignoto, del futuro, della solitudine, e veniamo in parte anche lasciati con un enigma di come andrà a finire. Si integreranno coi terrestri? Si creerà una nuova forma mdi vita? Il pianeta da cui provengono invierà altri a sterminarci?

Gli interrogativi sono sociali sulla prevaricazione di certe culture su altre ed etici sul dare la morte e sul vivere in che tipo di comunità.

Una recensione di Peter Bradshaw (The Guardian, 22-2-2018) definisce giustamente questo film “elegant and weird”.


[Roberto Bertoni]